Can You Smell What The Wolfman’s Cookin’?

Another week, another rumor for Universal’s recently-announced monster movie series “Dark Universe”. It’s no secret that Universal has been going after A-list actors to bring their monsters to life, with Tom Cruise and Russell Crowe leading the charge as two of the stars of The Mummy (playing Nick Morton and Dr. Jekyll, respectively). Javier Bardem has also been cast as the Frankenstein Monster in the recently announced Bill Condon-directed Bride of Frankenstein, and Johnny Depp rounds out the list of confirmed stars as The Invisible Man in an as-yet-unannounced feature.

It has long been rumored that Universal is very much interested in Angelina Jolie to play the title role in Bride of Frankenstein, but just recently, another rumor has been making the rounds suggesting that Universal is sparing no expense in an attempt to land Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson in the role of Lawrence Talbot/The Wolfman, the part made famous by Lon Chaney Jr. in the 1941 original film The Wolf Man. This shouldn’t come as a surprise, as Johnson has proven to be a real draw for movie-going audiences, having found success throughout multiple genres and franchises. He’s been an action hero, a dramatic actor, and a great comedian, so why not try his hand at horror? In fact, let us not forget that before he was revitalizing the Fast and the Furious series, and back when the public knew him simply as “The Rock”, Johnson experienced his first real foray into acting in motion pictures playing The Scorpion King in 2001’s The Mummy Returns. Perhaps things are coming around full circle and the prodigal son is returning home to the universe – or Dark Universe – that helped make Dwayne Johnson a household name beyond the wrestling ring.

What do you think about Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson possibly stepping into the furry paws of Lon Chaney Jr.? Will this be a welcome back to the universe that helped launch his acting career? If so, let us just hope the makeup looks a tad better than this:

disney_bambi_remake

-Freddy

Universal Reveals the “Dark Universe”

We’re just two weeks away from the release of Universal’s The Mummy, the first in a presumed shared universe of inter-connected monster movies. Presumptions have now officially been made reality as Universal has not only given this shared universe a name – “Dark Universe” – but they’ve already revealed the next feature to follow after The Mummy.

Bride of Frankenstein will be released on February 14th, 2019 – a romantic date for Universal’s most delightfully frightful couple. The film will be directed by Bill Condon – right off the heels of his monster hit (see what I did there?) Beauty and the Beast – based on a screenplay by David Koepp (Jurassic Park).

Angelina Jolie has long been rumored to portray the role made famous by Elsa Lanchester in the 1935 James Whale original. While no official casting announcement has been made, Universal has stated that casting of the titular role will be announced soon.

Universal has already confirmed that Academy Award Winner Javier Bardem will be joining the Dark Universe family as the Frankenstein Monster, so we can only assume that he will be playing a major role in Bride. Bardem is the latest actor to join the star-studded Dark Universe alongside Johnny Depp as The Invisible Man, Russell Crowe as Dr. Jekyll, Tom Cruise as Nick Morton, and Sofia Boutella as the titular monster in The Mummy. Universal has assembled the stars in the first official Dark Universe cast photo below.

dark_universe_talent_-_h_2017

Additionally, Universal has released a sizzle reel comprised of footage from the original Universal Monsters shared universe (more on that here).

What are your thoughts on the Dark Universe? Which monster are you most excited to see reimagined on the big screen? And most importantly, which of these movies will make the best future Halloween Horror Nights house?!

-Freddy

Universal Monsters: The Original Cinematic Universe

monsters

In Hollywood, one’s success is another one’s envy. If one idea works, you can almost guarantee that imitators will follow closely behind. With the ongoing success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it comes as no surprise that just about every major film studio is looking to capitalize on the idea of an interconnected series of films. Sure, Warner Bros.’ DC Extended Universe is a no-brainer, and an expansive Star Wars film series is expected. But a Hasbro Toys universe? A multi-picture Ghostbusters mega-multi-franchise? While it could be argued that studios should focus on getting ONE movie done correctly before deciding if a universe is the right idea, this is an argument for a different post. The reality is that Hollywood, like fashion, runs on trends and everybody wants to wear what’s en vogue this season.

Among the many expanded franchises currently in development is Universal Studios’ revamp of their classic Universal Monsters line-up set to kick off with 2017’s The Mummy. But could Universal Studios be accused of following the latest Hollywood trend or were they, in fact, the original trendsetter?

Now, I won’t go into an entire history lesson on the original slate of Universal Studios monster films from the 1920s to the 1950s. For that, you can check out our very own Christopher Ripley’s book Universal Monsters: Origins. Just know that in the decade between 1931 and 1941, Universal Studios saw great success by developing a variety of well-received monster movies, many of which spawned multiple sequels. Dracula and Frankenstein were both released in 1931, followed closely by The Mummy in 1932, and The Invisible Man in 1933. Then, in 1941, Universal Studios released The Wolf Man. During this decade, each individual monster franchise existed in its own world with its own set of rules, history, and mythology. That is, until 1943, when for the first time ever in film, worlds collided, monsters mashed, and the original cinematic universe was born with Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man.

frankenstein-meets-the-wolf-man-magnificent-hd-wallpaper-14294277425

Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man plays as both a sequel to 1941’s The Wolf Man, as well as 1942’s Ghost of Frankenstein (4th in the Frankenstein series). Lon Chaney Jr. reprises his role as Lawrence Talbot/The Wolf Man, while the Frankenstein Monster is played by, hold your hats, Bela Lugosi. Yes, Count Dracula himself. The film made references to the original Wolf Man film as well as the previous entries in the Frankenstein series, cementing that both franchises occupied the same universe and follow the same history and consequences. Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, like Marvel’s The Avengers, upped the budget, expanded the scope of the world, brought popular characters together, and featured….a musical number?

faro_la_faro_li
Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man features a performance of the folk song “Faro-La Faro-Li”. The number is cut short when it is rudely interrupted by a frantic Larry Talbot and a rampaging Frankenstein Monster.

With the success of Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, Universal Studios realized they had just struck gold. If Frankenstein and the Wolf Man could occupy the same world, who else can come and play? For the next ten years, Universal would expand on this winning formula with films like House of Frankenstein (1944), which threw Count Dracula into the mix, this time played by John Carradine, followed by House of Dracula (1945). Then, Universal rewrote the rule book once again by crossing over their famous horror monsters with successful comic actors Bud Abbott and Lou Costello. Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein brought together Dracula, Frankenstein’s Monster, The Wolf Man, and even a cameo by The Invisible Man, all while introducing horror fanatics to two of America’s most popular comedians of the era.

So, in this current climate of expansive film franchises, can you really blame Universal Studios for wanting to go back to the well and revisit the formula they created over 70 years ago? While Disney and Marvel have redefined the idea for the modern age of film, you can’t deny that the universe was created by Universal Studios and the Universal Monsters. Hell, it’s in the name, isn’t it?

annex-lugosi-bela-frankenstein-meets-the-wolf-man_03

Fun Fact: After the success of Dracula (1931), Bela Lugosi was offered the role of the Frankenstein Monster, but reportedly declined the part. Some accounts cite the reasoning as being Lugosi’s interest in playing the role of Dr. Victor Frankenstein instead. Others say Lugosi felt the makeup interfered with his performance. The role eventually went to Boris Karloff, who has defined the look and attitude of the character  for close to a century.

-Freddy